
Senator Robert Dvorsky
As we, and many others much more deeply, covered during the debate over the 2012 state budget, there was considerable wrangling over its size.
Republicans, including Governor Branstad, insisted on a total spending cap of below six (6) billion dollars. Democrats, arguing that state finances projected a significant surplus for 2012, insisted on budgets in a range of $6.2 billion to $6.5 billion. It was not until the last week prior to a government shutdown that everyone agreed to a budget of $5.99 billion, which complied with the Governor’s objective. One of the tricks used to get an agreement from those wishing to spend more was to shift $282 million to accounts outside of the general fund.
Today, the state auditor, David Vaudt, released his latest projections on the finalized 2012 budget and Vaudt states the following in a story in the Des Moines Register…
“The reason the total spending is bigger than the $5.9 billion claimed by the Legislature and the governor is because they shifted $282 million in spending to accounts outside the general fund. They then could claim general fund spending was smaller than the previous year, when it wasn’t an apples-to-apples comparison.”
Moreover, it looks like Iowa will run a budget deficit next year…
“The budget taps $53 million of one-time money from the economic emergency fund – so the state will spend $53 million more than it takes in this fiscal year, Vaudt said.”
So, it appears, as usual, that the practice of politics included some oft used budget tricks to reach “compromise”, again from the story in the Des Moines Register…
“In fiscal year 2010, the Democrats who controlled both chambers and the governor’s office shifted $173 million outside the general fund, Vaudt said.”
It would be nice if these time honored practices ended, but the statement that caused the most preplexity in our minds and caused us to shake our heads in incredulity was the following from Sen. Bob Dvorsky, D-Coralville, chairman of the Iowa Senate Appropriations Committee……
“Today’s report by the state auditor is more evidence that the Governor and Republican legislators were misguided when they repeatedly tried impose deep, damaging cuts in funding to Iowa’s local schools, health care and job-creation efforts during the 2011 session.
“I welcome Republican State Auditor Dave Vaudt’s positive review of the state budget. For whatever reason, the auditor has finally recognized that Senate Democrats have once again balanced the state budget without raising taxes and while protecting the top priorities of Iowans.
“Iowa’s budget is on the right track, thanks primarily to our state’s on-going economic recovery, a recovery that is stronger than that of most other states. Another factor in our improving budget is last year’s work by Democrats to cut costs by streamlining state services, resulting in the first substantial reorganization of state government in nearly 25 years.”
Now, I am still trying to reconcile the number of statements that not only conflict with one another in this short statement, but conflict with the history in which Mr. Dvorsky ardently petitioned for increased spending in the last legistlative session. In an interview with the erstwhile Mr. Dvorsky in the Iowa City Patch, published on June 10, 2011, he had this to say…..
Iowa City Patch: What are the main differences between the Republicans and Democrats in these negotiations?
Dvorsky: The big thing is setting the budget for fiscal 2012, and from the Senate Democrats’ point of view, the bottom line number the Republicans have is a very low number. So that means a lot of cuts to a lot of programs that we think are important to Iowa. This is an unprecedented low number …
In Iowa we have a 99 percent law: we can’t spend more than 99 percent of the revenues we bring in. (The remainder is) set aside into what’s called a Rainy Day Fund. So we put that in place in the ’90s. I don’t think any administration has ever spent less that 99 percent. This proposal is 96 percent. That’s an enormous drop. The money is available and the Republicans and the government just choose not to spend that. They just want to spend 96.2 [percent] … Their number one and pretty much only priority is to cut government spending.
Repeating from Mr. Dvorsky’s statement today…
“I welcome Republican State Auditor Dave Vaudt’s positive review of the state budget. For whatever reason, the auditor has finally recognized that Senate Democrats have once again balanced the state budget without raising taxes and while protecting the top priorities of Iowans.”
Actually, this is not a work in creative mendacity, but one in simply bald faced mendacity giving Mr. Dvorsky our a leg up in our mendacious politician of the year award.